Charlotte Tilbury
$50.00US price
We may earn a commission. It never changes a verdict.
Makeup · reviewed
Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter
vs e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Liquid Filter
The buying question
How do the documented product type, finish, SPF and fragrance listing compare?
Same on 4 of 4 features checked
Both are fragrance-free, luminous complexion boosters without SPF. The hero ingredients they name differ, e.l.f. offers 15 shades to Charlotte Tilbury's 12, and e.l.f. costs $15 against $50.
Equivalent performance is not established.
How we reached this verdict ↗Original
Charlotte Tilbury
Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter — 30 mL
$50.00US price
$166.67 / 100 mL
Checked
Alternative
e.l.f. Cosmetics
e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Liquid Filter — 31.5 mL
$15.00US price
$47.62 / 100 mL
Checked
Same, partial, different, unknown.
“Same” means a recorded feature matches, not equivalent performance.
Product type
Same- Original
- Complexion booster
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- Complexion booster
- Brand-stated
Both are sold as the same type of product.
Sources for Product type
Stated finish
Same- Original
- Luminous
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- Luminous
- Brand-stated
Charlotte Tilbury describes a "luminous glow"; e.l.f. a "luminous finish" with "glowy, soft-focus radiance".
Sources for Stated finish
SPF
Same- Original
- No SPF
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- No SPF
- Brand-stated
Neither has SPF.
Sources for SPF
Fragrance listed
Same- Original
- No
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- No
- Brand-stated
Neither ingredient list includes fragrance.
Sources for Fragrance listed
Listed key ingredients and disclosed percentages
Unknown- Original
- Airbrush polymers: percentage undisclosed
- Glossy oil: percentage undisclosed
- Finely milled powders: percentage undisclosed
- Porcelain flower extract: percentage undisclosed
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- Squalane: percentage undisclosed
- Hyaluronic acid: percentage undisclosed
- Brand-stated
Charlotte Tilbury names polymers, oils, powders and porcelain flower extract; e.l.f. names squalane and hyaluronic acid. No amounts are disclosed, so hero ingredients aren't part of the verdict.
Sources for Listed key ingredients and disclosed percentages
Outside this verdict’s scope; included for context.
US shade count
Different- Original
- 12
- Brand-stated
- Alternative
- 15
- Brand-stated
12 shades versus 15.
Sources for US shade count
Outside this verdict’s scope; included for context.
Claimed wear
Unknown- Original
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- Alternative
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
Wear claims are the brands' own and aren't compared.
Sources for Claimed wear
- Original
- Source not provided
- Check date not provided
- Alternative
- Source not provided
- Check date not provided
Outside this verdict’s scope; included for context.
What we couldn’t check
- Listed key ingredients and disclosed percentages. Neither brand discloses amounts; shown for information only.
- Claimed wear. Neither brand makes a wear-time claim.
- Comparative performance. Shade match, colour on skin, glow level and wear have not been compared.
Retailer options
We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases. It never changes a verdict.
Shipping and tax excluded. Confirm totals at the retailer.
Lowest unit price first per version; ties alphabetical, missing prices last. Commissions never affect this order.
Original · Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter — 30 mL
Ulta
$50.00US price
We may earn a commission. It never changes a verdict.
Alternative · e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Liquid Filter — 31.5 mL
e.l.f. Cosmetics
$15.00US price
We may earn a commission. It never changes a verdict.
Ulta
$15.00US price
We may earn a commission. It never changes a verdict.
Stores and prices shown are for the US.
Scope & corrections
Scope version 1 · Product type; Stated finish; SPF; Fragrance listed
This comparison uses its category’s standard scope. No scope changes are recorded.
No corrections have been recorded.
About corrections ↗